🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim could survive defeat by Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He withstood losing at home against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, squandering the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months of experience with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Conflict Over Formation & Philosophy

For example, this was the director who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like him – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Supreme Authority In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then bin him for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.